← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Kimi K2 Thinking

Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google DeepMind) and Kimi K2 Thinking (Moonshot) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind · 3 in the newsKimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot · 6 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)155146
Coding6547
Math7420
Reasoning & Knowledge9442
Agentic & Tools8329
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindMoonshot
FamilyGeminiKimi
ReleasedFeb 19, 2026Nov 6, 2025
Parameters1T
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (restricted use)
Context window262K
Price — $/M input$0.60
Price — $/M output$2.50
Inputstext
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202596%83%
APEX34%4%
ARC-AGI98%
ARC-AGI-277%
FrontierMath37%21%
FrontierMath Tier 417%0%
GPQA Diamond94%84%
GSO (code optimization)23%
Humanity's Last Exam46%22%
METR task horizon6.4 h54 min
SimpleBench80%
SimpleQA Verified77%32%
SWE-bench Verified76%
Terminal-Bench80%36%
WebDev Arena14611337
WeirdML72%43%
LiveCodeBench85%
MMLU-Pro85%
SciCode42%
τ²-bench93%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro better than Kimi K2 Thinking?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher (155) than Kimi K2 Thinking (146). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Kimi K2 Thinking?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Gemini 3.1 Pro ranks higher — 65th vs 47th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.