← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-5

Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google DeepMind) and GLM-5 (Z.ai (Zhipu AI)) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind · 3 in the newsGLM-5Z.ai (Zhipu AI) · 25 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)155146
Coding6449
Math7423
Reasoning & Knowledge9437
Agentic & Tools8263
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindZ.ai (Zhipu AI)
FamilyGemini
ReleasedFeb 19, 2026Feb 17, 2026
Parameters744B
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window205K
Price — $/M input$0.70
Price — $/M output$2.24
Inputstext
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202596%80%
APEX34%17%
ARC-AGI98%45%
ARC-AGI-277%5%
FrontierMath37%16%
FrontierMath Tier 417%2%
GPQA Diamond94%88%
GSO (code optimization)23%
Humanity's Last Exam46%27%
METR task horizon6.4 h
SimpleBench80%53%
SimpleQA Verified77%
SWE-bench Verified76%72%
Terminal-Bench80%52%
WebDev Arena14611447
WeirdML72%48%
SciCode46%
τ²-bench98%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro better than GLM-5?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher (155) than GLM-5 (146). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GLM-5?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Gemini 3.1 Pro ranks higher — 64th vs 49th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.