← All models
Compare

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google DeepMind) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google DeepMind) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 2 in the newsGemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind · 3 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)143155
Coding2165
Math1574
Reasoning & Knowledge2094
Agentic & Tools483
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindGoogle DeepMind
FamilyGeminiGemini
ReleasedSep 25, 2025Feb 19, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M
Price — $/M input$0.30
Price — $/M output$2.50
Inputsfile, image, text, audio, video
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202573%96%
APEX2%34%
ARC-AGI33%98%
ARC-AGI-23%77%
FrontierMath5%37%
FrontierMath Tier 44%17%
GPQA Diamond79%94%
Humanity's Last Exam12%46%
LiveCodeBench70%
MMLU-Pro83%
SciCode39%
SimpleBench41%80%
Terminal-Bench17%80%
WeirdML42%72%
τ²-bench32%
GSO (code optimization)23%
METR task horizon6.4 h
SimpleQA Verified77%
SWE-bench Verified76%
WebDev Arena1461

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Gemini 3.1 Pro?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher (155) than Gemini 2.5 Flash (143). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Gemini 3.1 Pro ranks higher — 65th vs 21th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.