← All models
Compare

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen 3.7 Max

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (DeepSeek) and Qwen 3.7 Max (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek · 1 in the newsQwen 3.7 MaxAlibaba · 4 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)154
Coding7578
Math73
Reasoning & Knowledge8183
Agentic & Tools80
Specifications
DeveloperDeepSeekAlibaba
FamilyDeepSeekQwen
ReleasedJul 31, 2026May 19, 2026
Parameters
Availability
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$0.14$1.48
Price — $/M output$0.28$4.42
Inputstexttext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
GPQA Diamond91%92%
Humanity's Last Exam37%38%
SciCode50%49%
AIME 2024/202595%
SimpleBench70%
SimpleQA Verified59%
SWE-bench Verified77%
WebDev Arena1541
τ²-bench95%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Qwen 3.7 Max?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.14 per million, versus $1.48 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Qwen 3.7 Max?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Qwen 3.7 Max ranks higher — 78th vs 75th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.