← All models
Compare

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus vs Grok 4.5

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus (DeepSeek) and Grok 4.5 (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusDeepSeekGrok 4.5xAI · 2 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)154
Coding4589
Math4984
Reasoning & Knowledge4168
Agentic & Tools1374
Specifications
DeveloperDeepSeekxAI
FamilyDeepSeekGrok
ReleasedSep 22, 2025Jul 8, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)API access
Context window164K500K
Price — $/M input$0.27$2.00
Price — $/M output$1.00$6.00
Inputstexttext, image, file
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202590%98%
GPQA Diamond79%93%
Humanity's Last Exam15%40%
LiveCodeBench80%
MMLU-Pro85%
SciCode41%54%
τ²-bench37%
APEX34%
ARC-AGI87%
ARC-AGI-253%
SimpleBench70%
SimpleQA Verified54%
WebDev Arena1551
WeirdML46%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Grok 4.5?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is cheaper on input tokens at $0.27 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Grok 4.5?

Grok 4.5 supports up to 500K tokens, compared with 164K for the other.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Grok 4.5?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.5 ranks higher — 89th vs 45th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.