← All models
Compare

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Muse Spark

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) and Muse Spark (Meta AI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic · 3 in the newsMuse SparkMeta AI · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)153154
Coding6479
Math4766
Reasoning & Knowledge5984
Agentic & Tools4764
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicMeta AI
FamilyClaude
ReleasedFeb 17, 2026Apr 8, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M
Price — $/M input$3.00
Price — $/M output$15.00
Inputstext, image, file
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202586%89%
APEX24%
ARC-AGI87%
ARC-AGI-260%
FrontierMath32%39%
FrontierMath Tier 48%15%
GPQA Diamond87%90%
Humanity's Last Exam30%41%
SciCode47%52%
SimpleQA Verified29%66%
SWE-bench Verified75%
Terminal-Bench53%
WebDev Arena15231513
WeirdML66%
τ²-bench76%92%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than Muse Spark?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Muse Spark scores higher (154) than Claude Sonnet 4.6 (153). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Muse Spark?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Muse Spark ranks higher — 79th vs 64th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.