← All models
Compare

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google DeepMind) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic · 3 in the newsGemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind · 3 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)153155
Coding6465
Math4774
Reasoning & Knowledge5994
Agentic & Tools4883
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicGoogle DeepMind
FamilyClaudeGemini
ReleasedFeb 17, 2026Feb 19, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M
Price — $/M input$3.00
Price — $/M output$15.00
Inputstext, image, file
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202586%96%
APEX24%34%
ARC-AGI87%98%
ARC-AGI-260%77%
FrontierMath32%37%
FrontierMath Tier 48%17%
GPQA Diamond87%94%
Humanity's Last Exam30%46%
SciCode47%
SimpleQA Verified29%77%
SWE-bench Verified75%76%
Terminal-Bench53%80%
WebDev Arena15231461
WeirdML66%72%
τ²-bench76%
GSO (code optimization)23%
METR task horizon6.4 h
SimpleBench80%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than Gemini 3.1 Pro?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher (155) than Claude Sonnet 4.6 (153). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Gemini 3.1 Pro ranks higher — 65th vs 64th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.