← All models
Compare

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Muse Spark

Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic) and Muse Spark (Meta AI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Opus 4.8Anthropic · 4 in the newsMuse SparkMeta AI · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)158154
Coding9379
Math9066
Reasoning & Knowledge7784
Agentic & Tools8664
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicMeta AI
FamilyClaude
ReleasedMay 28, 2026Apr 8, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M
Price — $/M input$5.00
Price — $/M output$25.00
Inputstext, image, file
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202598%89%
APEX43%
ARC-AGI93%
ARC-AGI-272%
FrontierMath47%39%
FrontierMath Tier 431%15%
GPQA Diamond91%90%
GSO (code optimization)47%
Humanity's Last Exam46%41%
SciCode54%52%
SimpleBench65%
SimpleQA Verified40%66%
WebDev Arena15521513
WeirdML83%
τ²-bench94%92%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.8 better than Muse Spark?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Opus 4.8 scores higher (158) than Muse Spark (154). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.8 or Muse Spark?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Opus 4.8 ranks higher — 93th vs 79th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.