← All models
Compare

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Claude Opus 4.5 (Anthropic) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google DeepMind) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Opus 4.5AnthropicGemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind · 3 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)150155
Coding7265
Math3174
Reasoning & Knowledge6394
Agentic & Tools6383
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicGoogle DeepMind
FamilyClaudeGemini
ReleasedNov 24, 2025Feb 19, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window200K
Price — $/M input$5.00
Price — $/M output$25.00
Inputsfile, image, text
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202586%96%
APEX21%34%
ARC-AGI80%98%
ARC-AGI-238%77%
FrontierMath21%37%
FrontierMath Tier 44%17%
GDPval (win/tie rate)60%
GPQA Diamond86%94%
GSO (code optimization)27%23%
Humanity's Last Exam25%46%
LiveCodeBench87%
METR task horizon4.9 h6.4 h
MMLU-Pro90%
SciCode50%
SimpleBench62%80%
SimpleQA Verified42%77%
SWE-bench Verified77%76%
Terminal-Bench63%80%
WebDev Arena15121461
WeirdML64%72%
τ²-bench89%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Gemini 3.1 Pro?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher (155) than Claude Opus 4.5 (150). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Opus 4.5 ranks higher — 72th vs 65th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.