← All models
Compare

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Muse Spark

Claude Opus 4.1 (Anthropic) and Muse Spark (Meta AI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Opus 4.1AnthropicMuse SparkMeta AI · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)144154
Coding3279
Math1766
Reasoning & Knowledge3084
Agentic & Tools2464
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicMeta AI
FamilyClaude
ReleasedAug 5, 2025Apr 8, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window200K
Price — $/M input$15.00
Price — $/M output$75.00
Inputsimage, text, file
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202569%89%
FrontierMath7%39%
FrontierMath Tier 44%15%
GDPval (win/tie rate)48%
GPQA Diamond77%90%
Humanity's Last Exam12%41%
METR task horizon1.9 h
SimpleBench60%
SimpleQA Verified35%66%
SWE-bench Verified73%
Terminal-Bench38%
WebDev Arena13861513
WeirdML43%
SciCode52%
τ²-bench92%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Muse Spark?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Muse Spark scores higher (154) than Claude Opus 4.1 (144). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.1 or Muse Spark?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Muse Spark ranks higher — 79th vs 32th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.