← All models
Compare

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Claude Opus 4.1 (Anthropic) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google DeepMind) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Opus 4.1AnthropicGemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind · 3 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)144155
Coding3365
Math1774
Reasoning & Knowledge3094
Agentic & Tools2483
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicGoogle DeepMind
FamilyClaudeGemini
ReleasedAug 5, 2025Feb 19, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window200K
Price — $/M input$15.00
Price — $/M output$75.00
Inputsimage, text, file
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202569%96%
FrontierMath7%37%
FrontierMath Tier 44%17%
GDPval (win/tie rate)48%
GPQA Diamond77%94%
Humanity's Last Exam12%46%
METR task horizon1.9 h6.4 h
SimpleBench60%80%
SimpleQA Verified35%77%
SWE-bench Verified73%76%
Terminal-Bench38%80%
WebDev Arena13861461
WeirdML43%72%
APEX34%
ARC-AGI98%
ARC-AGI-277%
GSO (code optimization)23%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Gemini 3.1 Pro?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher (155) than Claude Opus 4.1 (144). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.1 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Gemini 3.1 Pro ranks higher — 65th vs 33th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.