← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs GPT‑5-Codex

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and GPT‑5-Codex (OpenAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 40 in the newsGPT‑5-CodexOpenAI
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161
Coding9953
Math9592
Reasoning & Knowledge9659
Agentic & Tools9847
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicOpenAI
FamilyClaudeGPT
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Sep 15, 2025
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M400K
Price — $/M input$10.00$1.25
Price — $/M output$50.00$10.00
Inputstext, image, filetext, image
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%99%
APEX45%20%
GPQA Diamond93%84%
Humanity's Last Exam53%26%
SciCode60%41%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified68%
WebDev Arena1654
WeirdML92%55%
τ²-bench99%87%
LiveCodeBench84%
MMLU-Pro87%
Terminal-Bench44%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GPT‑5-Codex?

GPT‑5-Codex is cheaper on input tokens at $1.25 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or GPT‑5-Codex?

Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 400K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or GPT‑5-Codex?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 99th vs 53th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.