← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek-V3.1

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek-V3.1 (DeepSeek) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 40 in the newsDeepSeek-V3.1DeepSeek
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161139
Coding9915
Math953
Reasoning & Knowledge9617
Agentic & Tools9810
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicDeepSeek
FamilyClaudeDeepSeek
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Aug 21, 2025
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M
Price — $/M input$10.00
Price — $/M output$50.00
Inputstext, image, file
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%50%
APEX45%
GPQA Diamond93%74%
Humanity's Last Exam53%6%
SciCode60%37%
SimpleBench82%40%
SimpleQA Verified68%
WebDev Arena1654
WeirdML92%38%
τ²-bench99%35%
LiveCodeBench58%
MMLU-Pro83%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than DeepSeek-V3.1?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (161) than DeepSeek-V3.1 (139). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V3.1?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 99th vs 15th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.