← All models
Compare

Kimi K3 vs Step 3.7 Flash

Kimi K3 (Moonshot) and Step 3.7 Flash (StepFun) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeKimi K3Moonshot · 35 in the newsStep 3.7 FlashStepFun
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)157
Coding9928
Math81
Reasoning & Knowledge7830
Agentic & Tools8498
Specifications
DeveloperMoonshotStepFun
FamilyKimi
ReleasedJul 16, 2026May 29, 2026
Parameters2.8T
AvailabilityOpen weights (non-commercial)Open weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M262K
Price — $/M input$2.80$0.20
Price — $/M output$14.00$1.15
Inputstext, image, videotext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%
APEX39%
ARC-AGI95%
ARC-AGI-260%
GPQA Diamond93%81%
Humanity's Last Exam47%21%
SciCode59%40%
SimpleQA Verified43%
WebDev Arena1682
WeirdML83%
τ²-bench99%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.20 per million, versus $2.80 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K3 or Step 3.7 Flash?

Kimi K3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Kimi K3 or Step 3.7 Flash?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Kimi K3 ranks higher — 99th vs 28th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.