← All models
Compare

Kimi K3 vs Schematron V2 Turbo

Kimi K3 (Moonshot) and Schematron V2 Turbo (Inference.net) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeKimi K3Moonshot · 44 in the newsSchematron V2 TurboInference.net
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)158
Coding97
Math80
Reasoning & Knowledge73
Agentic & Tools80
Specifications
DeveloperMoonshotInference.net
FamilyKimi
ReleasedJul 16, 2026Sep 12, 2026
Parameters2.8T
AvailabilityOpen weights (non-commercial)
Context window1M128K
Price — $/M input$2.10$0.03
Price — $/M output$10.95$0.15
Inputstext, image, videotext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%
APEX39%
ARC-AGI95%
ARC-AGI-260%
GPQA Diamond93%
Humanity's Last Exam47%
SciCode60%
SimpleBench61%
SimpleQA Verified51%
WebDev Arena1674
WeirdML83%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Schematron V2 Turbo?

Schematron V2 Turbo is cheaper on input tokens at $0.03 per million, versus $2.10 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K3 or Schematron V2 Turbo?

Kimi K3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 128K for the other.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.