← All models
Compare

Kimi K3 vs Ring-2.6-1T

Kimi K3 (Moonshot) and Ring-2.6-1T (Ant Group) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeKimi K3Moonshot · 35 in the newsRing-2.6-1TAnt Group
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)157
Coding9942
Math81
Reasoning & Knowledge7839
Agentic & Tools8464
Specifications
DeveloperMoonshotAnt Group
FamilyKimi
ReleasedJul 16, 2026May 14, 2026
Parameters2.8T
AvailabilityOpen weights (non-commercial)Open weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M262K
Price — $/M input$2.80$0.07
Price — $/M output$14.00$0.63
Inputstext, image, videotext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%
APEX39%
ARC-AGI95%
ARC-AGI-260%
GPQA Diamond93%86%
Humanity's Last Exam47%22%
SciCode59%42%
SimpleQA Verified43%
WebDev Arena1682
WeirdML83%
τ²-bench92%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Ring-2.6-1T?

Ring-2.6-1T is cheaper on input tokens at $0.07 per million, versus $2.80 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K3 or Ring-2.6-1T?

Kimi K3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Kimi K3 or Ring-2.6-1T?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Kimi K3 ranks higher — 99th vs 42th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.