← All models
Compare

Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Kimi K3 (Moonshot) and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (Qwen) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeKimi K3Moonshot · 34 in the newsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)157
Coding9977
Math81
Reasoning & Knowledge7890
Agentic & Tools84
Specifications
DeveloperMoonshotQwen
FamilyKimiQwen
ReleasedJul 16, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Parameters2.8T
AvailabilityOpen weights (non-commercial)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$2.80$2.00
Price — $/M output$14.00$6.00
Inputstext, image, videotext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%
APEX39%
ARC-AGI95%
ARC-AGI-260%
GPQA Diamond93%94%
Humanity's Last Exam47%42%
SciCode59%52%
SimpleQA Verified43%
WebDev Arena1682
WeirdML83%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is cheaper on input tokens at $2.00 per million, versus $2.80 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Kimi K3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Kimi K3 ranks higher — 99th vs 77th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.