← All models
Compare

Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B

Kimi K3 (Moonshot) and Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeKimi K3Moonshot · 47 in the newsQwen3.8-2.4T-A95BAlibaba · 2 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)158—
Coding9478
Math73—
Reasoning & Knowledge6985
Agentic & Tools66—
Specifications
DeveloperMoonshotAlibaba
FamilyKimiQwen
ReleasedJul 16, 2026Aug 8, 2026
Parameters2.8T2.4T
AvailabilityOpen weights (non-commercial)Open weights (restricted use)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$1.44$2.00
Price — $/M output$9.00$6.00
Inputstext, image, videotext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%—
APEX51%—
ARC-AGI95%—
ARC-AGI-260%—
GPQA Diamond93%94%
Humanity's Last Exam47%42%
SciCode60%54%
SimpleBench61%—
SimpleQA Verified51%—
WebDev Arena1674—
WeirdML83%—

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B?

Kimi K3 is cheaper on input tokens at $1.44 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B?

Kimi K3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Kimi K3 ranks higher — 94th vs 78th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.