← All models
Compare

Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Kimi K3 (Moonshot) and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeKimi K3Moonshot · 43 in the newsQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)158146
Coding9733
Math80
Reasoning & Knowledge7327
Agentic & Tools8036
Specifications
DeveloperMoonshotAlibaba
FamilyKimiQwen
ReleasedJul 16, 2026Feb 24, 2026
Parameters2.8T122B
AvailabilityOpen weights (non-commercial)Open weights (restricted use)
Context window1M262K
Price — $/M input$2.10$0.26
Price — $/M output$10.95$2.08
Inputstext, image, videotext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%
APEX39%
ARC-AGI95%
ARC-AGI-260%
GPQA Diamond93%83%
Humanity's Last Exam47%16%
SciCode60%42%
SimpleBench61%
SimpleQA Verified51%
WebDev Arena1674
WeirdML83%
τ²-bench85%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K3 better than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Kimi K3 scores higher (158) than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (146). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is cheaper on input tokens at $0.26 per million, versus $2.10 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Kimi K3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Kimi K3 ranks higher — 97th vs 33th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.