← All models
Compare

Kimi K3 vs Qwen 3.6 Flash

Kimi K3 (Moonshot) and Qwen 3.6 Flash (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeKimi K3Moonshot · 43 in the newsQwen 3.6 FlashAlibaba
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)158143
Coding97
Math8013
Reasoning & Knowledge7312
Agentic & Tools80
Specifications
DeveloperMoonshotAlibaba
FamilyKimiQwen
ReleasedJul 16, 2026Apr 27, 2026
Parameters2.8T
AvailabilityOpen weights (non-commercial)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$2.10$0.19
Price — $/M output$10.95$1.13
Inputstext, image, videotext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%84%
APEX39%
ARC-AGI95%
ARC-AGI-260%
GPQA Diamond93%83%
Humanity's Last Exam47%
SciCode60%
SimpleBench61%35%
SimpleQA Verified51%16%
WebDev Arena1674
WeirdML83%
FrontierMath10%
FrontierMath Tier 40%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K3 better than Qwen 3.6 Flash?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Kimi K3 scores higher (158) than Qwen 3.6 Flash (143). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Qwen 3.6 Flash?

Qwen 3.6 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.19 per million, versus $2.10 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K3 or Qwen 3.6 Flash?

Kimi K3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.