← All models
Compare

Kimi K3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B

Kimi K3 (Moonshot) and Muse Glimmer 30B (Meta) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeKimi K3Moonshot · 33 in the newsMuse Glimmer 30BMeta
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)157
Coding99
Math82
Reasoning & Knowledge78
Agentic & Tools84
Specifications
DeveloperMoonshotMeta
FamilyKimi
ReleasedJul 16, 2026Aug 9, 2026
Parameters2.8T
AvailabilityOpen weights (non-commercial)
Context window1M131K
Price — $/M input$2.80$0.30
Price — $/M output$14.00$1.20
Inputstext, image, videotext, image
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%
APEX39%
ARC-AGI95%
ARC-AGI-260%
GPQA Diamond93%
Humanity's Last Exam47%
SciCode59%
SimpleQA Verified43%
WebDev Arena1682
WeirdML83%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Muse Glimmer 30B?

Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper on input tokens at $0.30 per million, versus $2.80 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K3 or Muse Glimmer 30B?

Kimi K3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 131K for the other.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.