← All models
Compare

Kimi K3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B

Kimi K3 (Moonshot) and Muse Glimmer 30B (Meta) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeKimi K3Moonshot · 47 in the newsMuse Glimmer 30BMeta
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)158—
Coding94—
Math73—
Reasoning & Knowledge69—
Agentic & Tools66—
Specifications
DeveloperMoonshotMeta
FamilyKimi—
ReleasedJul 16, 2026Aug 9, 2026
Parameters2.8T—
AvailabilityOpen weights (non-commercial)—
Context window1M131K
Price — $/M input$1.44$0.30
Price — $/M output$9.00$1.10
Inputstext, image, videotext, image
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%—
APEX51%—
ARC-AGI95%—
ARC-AGI-260%—
GPQA Diamond93%—
Humanity's Last Exam47%—
SciCode60%—
SimpleBench61%—
SimpleQA Verified51%—
WebDev Arena1674—
WeirdML83%—

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Muse Glimmer 30B?

Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper on input tokens at $0.30 per million, versus $1.44 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K3 or Muse Glimmer 30B?

Kimi K3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 131K for the other.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.