← All models
Compare

Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.0-flash

Kimi K3 (Moonshot) and Ling-3.0-flash () compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeKimi K3Moonshot · 39 in the newsLing-3.0-flash · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)158
Coding9735
Math81
Reasoning & Knowledge7342
Agentic & Tools80
Specifications
DeveloperMoonshot
FamilyKimi
ReleasedJul 16, 2026Jul 23, 2026
Parameters2.8T
AvailabilityOpen weights (non-commercial)
Context window1M262K
Price — $/M input$2.55$0.06
Price — $/M output$12.75$0.18
Inputstext, image, videotext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%
APEX39%
ARC-AGI95%
ARC-AGI-260%
GPQA Diamond93%86%
Humanity's Last Exam47%24%
SciCode60%42%
SimpleBench61%
SimpleQA Verified51%
WebDev Arena1674
WeirdML83%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Ling-3.0-flash?

Ling-3.0-flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.06 per million, versus $2.55 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K3 or Ling-3.0-flash?

Kimi K3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Kimi K3 or Ling-3.0-flash?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Kimi K3 ranks higher — 97th vs 35th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.