← All models
Compare

Granite 4.2 8B vs Kimi K3

Granite 4.2 8B (IBM) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGranite 4.2 8BIBMKimi K3Moonshot · 39 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)158
Coding797
Math81
Reasoning & Knowledge773
Agentic & Tools80
Specifications
DeveloperIBMMoonshot
FamilyKimi
ReleasedAug 31, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Parameters2.8T
AvailabilityOpen weights (non-commercial)
Context window131K1M
Price — $/M input$0.06$2.55
Price — $/M output$0.25$12.75
Inputstexttext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
GPQA Diamond63%93%
Humanity's Last Exam10%47%
SciCode32%60%
AIME 2024/202597%
APEX39%
ARC-AGI95%
ARC-AGI-260%
SimpleBench61%
SimpleQA Verified51%
WebDev Arena1674
WeirdML83%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Kimi K3?

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper on input tokens at $0.06 per million, versus $2.55 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Granite 4.2 8B or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 131K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Granite 4.2 8B or Kimi K3?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Kimi K3 ranks higher — 97th vs 7th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.