← All models
Compare

GLM-5.3 vs Grok 4.6

GLM-5.3 (Z.ai (Zhipu AI)) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGLM-5.3Z.ai (Zhipu AI) · 3 in the newsGrok 4.6xAI · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156
Coding9691
Math93
Reasoning & Knowledge8576
Agentic & Tools89
Specifications
DeveloperZ.ai (Zhipu AI)xAI
FamilyGrok
ReleasedAug 14, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Parameters744B
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M500K
Price — $/M input$1.40$2.00
Price — $/M output$4.40$6.00
Inputstexttext, image, file
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
GPQA Diamond92%94%
Humanity's Last Exam42%43%
SciCode56%54%
AIME 2024/202599%
APEX41%
ARC-AGI88%
ARC-AGI-267%
SimpleQA Verified54%
WebDev Arena1631
WeirdML67%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.3 or Grok 4.6?

GLM-5.3 is cheaper on input tokens at $1.40 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, GLM-5.3 or Grok 4.6?

GLM-5.3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 500K for the other.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.3 or Grok 4.6?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, GLM-5.3 ranks higher — 96th vs 91th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.