← All models
Compare

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Kimi K3

GLM 5.3 FlashX (Z.ai) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGLM 5.3 FlashXZ.ai · 1 in the newsKimi K3Moonshot · 44 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)158
Coding97
Math80
Reasoning & Knowledge73
Agentic & Tools80
Specifications
DeveloperZ.aiMoonshot
FamilyKimi
ReleasedSep 18, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Parameters2.8T
AvailabilityOpen weights (non-commercial)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$0.37$2.10
Price — $/M output$1.25$10.95
Inputstext, image, videotext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%
APEX39%
ARC-AGI95%
ARC-AGI-260%
GPQA Diamond93%
Humanity's Last Exam47%
SciCode60%
SimpleBench61%
SimpleQA Verified51%
WebDev Arena1674
WeirdML83%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Kimi K3?

GLM 5.3 FlashX is cheaper on input tokens at $0.37 per million, versus $2.10 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Kimi K3?

GLM 5.3 FlashX supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.