GLM-5.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
GLM-5.1 (Z.ai (Zhipu AI)) and Qwen3.5-9B (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- Qwen3.5-9B is cheaper on input tokens — $0.10 vs $0.98 per 1M.
- Qwen3.5-9B has a larger context window (262K vs 203K tokens).
- GLM-5.1 ranks higher for coding (65th vs 2th percentile).
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.5-9B?
Qwen3.5-9B is cheaper on input tokens at $0.10 per million, versus $0.98 (representative OpenRouter pricing).
Which has a larger context window, GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.5-9B?
Qwen3.5-9B supports up to 262K tokens, compared with 203K for the other.
Which is better for coding, GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.5-9B?
Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, GLM-5.1 ranks higher — 65th vs 2th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.