Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5
Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.5 (OpenAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- GPT-5.5 leads on overall intelligence (ECI 159 vs 157).
- GPT-5.5 has a larger context window (1.1M vs 1M tokens).
- Claude Opus 4.8 ranks higher for coding (96th vs 89th percentile).
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 4.8 better than GPT-5.5?
On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, GPT-5.5 scores higher (159) than Claude Opus 4.8 (157). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.5?
Claude Opus 4.8 is cheaper on input tokens at $5.00 per million, versus $5.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.5?
GPT-5.5 supports up to 1.1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.
Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.5?
Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Opus 4.8 ranks higher — 96th vs 89th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.