← All models
Compare

Gemma 4 31B IT vs Kimi K3

Gemma 4 31B IT (Google DeepMind) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemma 4 31B ITGoogle DeepMindKimi K3Moonshot · 43 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)143158
Coding2697
Math1582
Reasoning & Knowledge1873
Agentic & Tools80
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindMoonshot
FamilyGemmaKimi
ReleasedApr 2, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Parameters2.8T
AvailabilityOpen weights (restricted use)Open weights (non-commercial)
Context window262K1M
Price — $/M input$0.12$2.10
Price — $/M output$0.35$10.95
Inputsimage, text, videotext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202573%97%
GPQA Diamond76%93%
SimpleQA Verified10%51%
WebDev Arena13641674
WeirdML52%83%
APEX39%
ARC-AGI95%
ARC-AGI-260%
Humanity's Last Exam47%
SciCode60%
SimpleBench61%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Kimi K3?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Kimi K3 scores higher (158) than Gemma 4 31B IT (143). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B IT or Kimi K3?

Gemma 4 31B IT is cheaper on input tokens at $0.12 per million, versus $2.10 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 31B IT or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 31B IT or Kimi K3?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Kimi K3 ranks higher — 97th vs 26th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.