Compare
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5.5
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Google DeepMind) and GPT-5.5 (OpenAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- GPT-5.5 ranks higher for coding (90th vs 26th percentile).
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)—159
Coding2690
Math—97
Reasoning & Knowledge491
Agentic & Tools—95
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindOpenAI
FamilyGemmaGPT
ReleasedApr 2, 2026Apr 23, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)API access
Context window—1.1M
Price — $/M input—$5.00
Price — $/M output—$30.00
Inputs—file, image, text
Outputs—text
Benchmarks
WebDev Arena13591505
WeirdML35%85%
AIME 2024/2025—100%
APEX—38%
ARC-AGI—95%
ARC-AGI-2—85%
FrontierMath—52%
FrontierMath Tier 4—35%
GPQA Diamond—94%
GSO (code optimization)—40%
SimpleBench—69%
SimpleQA Verified—63%
SWE-bench Verified—81%
Terminal-Bench—85%
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 26B A4B or GPT-5.5?
Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, GPT-5.5 ranks higher — 90th vs 26th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.