Compare
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GLM-5.1
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Google DeepMind) and GLM-5.1 (Z.ai (Zhipu AI)) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- GLM-5.1 ranks higher for coding (65th vs 26th percentile).
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)—150
Coding2665
Math—63
Reasoning & Knowledge447
Agentic & Tools——
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindZ.ai (Zhipu AI)
FamilyGemma—
ReleasedApr 2, 2026Apr 7, 2026
Parameters—754B
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)—
Context window—203K
Price — $/M input—$0.98
Price — $/M output—$3.08
Inputs—text
Outputs—text
Benchmarks
WebDev Arena13591534
WeirdML35%57%
AIME 2024/2025—92%
FrontierMath—33%
FrontierMath Tier 4—13%
GPQA Diamond—85%
SimpleBench—59%
SimpleQA Verified—37%
SWE-bench Verified—74%
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 26B A4B or GLM-5.1?
Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, GLM-5.1 ranks higher — 65th vs 26th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.