← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.7-Max

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Google DeepMind) and Qwen3.7-Max (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.8 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 2 in the newsQwen3.7-MaxAlibaba · 4 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)159155
Coding7960
Math7352
Reasoning & Knowledge8866
Agentic & Tools8176
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindAlibaba
FamilyGeminiQwen
ReleasedSep 2, 2026May 19, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$0.75$1.48
Price — $/M output$3.75$4.42
Inputstext, image, video, file, audiotext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%96%
APEX64%—
ARC-AGI99%—
ARC-AGI-289%—
GPQA Diamond95%91%
Humanity's Last Exam45%41%
SciCode57%50%
SimpleBench82%70%
SimpleQA Verified70%56%
WebDev Arena15681517
WeirdML85%—
SWE-bench Verified—77%
τ²-bench—95%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Qwen3.7-Max?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher (159) than Qwen3.7-Max (155). The right pick depends on your task, so compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3.7-Max?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.75 per million, versus $1.48 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3.7-Max?

Neither: both support up to 1M tokens.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3.7-Max?

Gemini 3.8 Flash ranks higher across coding benchmarks like WebDev Arena and SciCode: 79th vs 60th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.