← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.6

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Google DeepMind) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.8 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 2 in the newsGrok 4.6xAI · 2 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156
Coding8792
Math9092
Reasoning & Knowledge9573
Agentic & Tools85
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindxAI
FamilyGeminiGrok
ReleasedSep 2, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M500K
Price — $/M input$0.75$2.00
Price — $/M output$3.75$6.00
Inputstext, image, video, file, audiotext, image, file
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%99%
GPQA Diamond95%94%
Humanity's Last Exam48%43%
SciCode57%56%
SimpleQA Verified70%49%
WebDev Arena15671629
APEX41%
ARC-AGI88%
ARC-AGI-267%
SimpleBench76%
WeirdML67%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Grok 4.6?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.75 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Grok 4.6?

Gemini 3.8 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 500K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Grok 4.6?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 92th vs 87th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.