← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Kimi K3

Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) (Google) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.7 Flash (batch)GoogleKimi K3Moonshot · 47 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)—158
Coding—94
Math—73
Reasoning & Knowledge—69
Agentic & Tools—66
Specifications
DeveloperGoogleMoonshot
FamilyGeminiKimi
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Parameters—2.8T
Availability—Open weights (non-commercial)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$0.19$1.44
Price — $/M output$0.94$9.00
Inputstext, image, video, file, audiotext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025—97%
APEX—51%
ARC-AGI—95%
ARC-AGI-2—60%
GPQA Diamond—93%
Humanity's Last Exam—47%
SciCode—60%
SimpleBench—61%
SimpleQA Verified—51%
WebDev Arena—1674
WeirdML—83%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) or Kimi K3?

Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) is cheaper on input tokens at $0.19 per million, versus $1.44 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) or Kimi K3?

Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.