← All models
Compare

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.7-Max

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) and Qwen3.7-Max (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek · 10 in the newsQwen3.7-MaxAlibaba · 4 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156154
Coding7562
Math7458
Reasoning & Knowledge6172
Agentic & Tools4778
Specifications
DeveloperDeepSeekAlibaba
FamilyDeepSeekQwen
ReleasedSep 9, 2026May 19, 2026
Parameters748B—
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)API access
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$0.14$1.48
Price — $/M output$0.54$4.42
Inputstext, imagetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202598%96%
APEX40%—
ARC-AGI95%—
ARC-AGI-273%—
GPQA Diamond90%91%
Humanity's Last Exam39%41%
SciCode52%50%
SimpleQA Verified43%56%
WebDev Arena16141517
SimpleBench—70%
SWE-bench Verified—77%
τ²-bench—95%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Qwen3.7-Max?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher (156) than Qwen3.7-Max (154). The right pick depends on your task, so compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.7-Max?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.14 per million, versus $1.48 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.7-Max?

Neither: both support up to 1M tokens.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.7-Max?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ranks higher across coding benchmarks like WebDev Arena and SciCode: 75th vs 62nd percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.