← All models
Compare

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek · 2 in the newsKimi K3Moonshot · 39 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)158
Coding7497
Math81
Reasoning & Knowledge7573
Agentic & Tools80
Specifications
DeveloperDeepSeekMoonshot
FamilyDeepSeekKimi
ReleasedSep 10, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Parameters2.8T
AvailabilityOpen weights (non-commercial)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$0.30$2.55
Price — $/M output$1.20$12.75
Inputstext, imagetext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
Humanity's Last Exam39%47%
SciCode52%60%
AIME 2024/202597%
APEX39%
ARC-AGI95%
ARC-AGI-260%
GPQA Diamond93%
SimpleBench61%
SimpleQA Verified51%
WebDev Arena1674
WeirdML83%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Kimi K3?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.30 per million, versus $2.55 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Kimi K3?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Kimi K3?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Kimi K3 ranks higher — 97th vs 74th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.