← All models
Compare

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) and GLM-5.3 (Z.ai (Zhipu AI)) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek · 14 in the newsGLM-5.3Z.ai (Zhipu AI) · 16 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)157157
Coding7489
Math6835
Reasoning & Knowledge5762
Agentic & Tools3973
Specifications
DeveloperDeepSeekZ.ai (Zhipu AI)
FamilyDeepSeek—
ReleasedSep 9, 2026Aug 14, 2026
Parameters552B744B
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)Open weights (restricted use)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$0.02$0.40
Price — $/M output$0.40$2.46
Inputstext, imagetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202598%91%
APEX40%57%
ARC-AGI95%—
ARC-AGI-273%—
GPQA Diamond90%91%
Humanity's Last Exam39%42%
SciCode52%59%
SimpleBench67%66%
SimpleQA Verified43%41%
WebDev Arena16141614
WeirdML—75%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than GLM-5.3?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GLM-5.3 both score 157. The right pick depends on your task, so compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM-5.3?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.02 per million, versus $0.40 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM-5.3?

Neither: both support up to 1M tokens.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 ranks higher across coding benchmarks like WebDev Arena and SciCode: 89th vs 74th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.