← All models
Compare

Command A+ vs Kimi K3

Command A+ (Cohere,Cohere Labs (formerly Cohere for AI)) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeCommand A+Cohere,Cohere Labs (formerly Cohere for AI) · 6 in the newsKimi K3Moonshot · 40 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)158
Coding2097
Math81
Reasoning & Knowledge1573
Agentic & Tools2980
Specifications
DeveloperCohere,Cohere Labs (formerly Cohere for AI)Moonshot
FamilyCommandKimi
ReleasedMay 20, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Parameters2.8T
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)Open weights (non-commercial)
Context window256K1M
Price — $/M input$2.50$2.55
Price — $/M output$10.00$12.75
Inputstexttext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
GPQA Diamond76%93%
Humanity's Last Exam12%47%
SciCode39%60%
τ²-bench81%
AIME 2024/202597%
APEX39%
ARC-AGI95%
ARC-AGI-260%
SimpleBench61%
SimpleQA Verified51%
WebDev Arena1674
WeirdML83%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Kimi K3?

Command A+ is cheaper on input tokens at $2.50 per million, versus $2.55 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Command A+ or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 256K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Command A+ or Kimi K3?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Kimi K3 ranks higher — 97th vs 20th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.