← All models
Compare

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Kimi K3

Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Sonnet 5Anthropic · 3 in the newsKimi K3Moonshot · 33 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156157
Coding7999
Math7082
Reasoning & Knowledge6078
Agentic & Tools6484
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicMoonshot
FamilyClaudeKimi
ReleasedJun 30, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Parameters2.8T
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (non-commercial)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$2.00$2.80
Price — $/M output$10.00$14.00
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202595%97%
APEX33%39%
GPQA Diamond91%93%
GSO (code optimization)37%
Humanity's Last Exam41%47%
SciCode54%59%
SimpleBench61%
SimpleQA Verified25%43%
WebDev Arena15441682
WeirdML69%83%
ARC-AGI95%
ARC-AGI-260%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than Kimi K3?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Kimi K3 scores higher (157) than Claude Sonnet 5 (156). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or Kimi K3?

Claude Sonnet 5 is cheaper on input tokens at $2.00 per million, versus $2.80 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 5 or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 5 or Kimi K3?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Kimi K3 ranks higher — 99th vs 79th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.