← All models
Compare

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Kimi K3

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic · 2 in the newsKimi K3Moonshot · 46 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)—158
Coding9694
Math9174
Reasoning & Knowledge7670
Agentic & Tools10067
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicMoonshot
FamilyClaudeKimi
ReleasedSep 28, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Parameters—2.8T
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (non-commercial)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$2.00$1.99
Price — $/M output$10.00$9.00
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%97%
APEX76%51%
GPQA Diamond96%93%
SimpleQA Verified47%51%
WebDev Arena16991674
ARC-AGI—95%
ARC-AGI-2—60%
Humanity's Last Exam—47%
SciCode—60%
SimpleBench—61%
WeirdML—83%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is cheaper on input tokens at $1.99 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Kimi K3?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Sonnet 5.5 ranks higher — 96th vs 94th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.