← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3

Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5.1Anthropic · 8 in the newsKimi K3Moonshot · 39 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)163158
Coding10097
Math9681
Reasoning & Knowledge9473
Agentic & Tools9880
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicMoonshot
FamilyClaudeKimi
ReleasedSep 1, 2026Jul 16, 2026
Parameters2.8T
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (non-commercial)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$10.00$2.55
Price — $/M output$50.00$12.75
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%97%
APEX47%39%
ARC-AGI98%95%
ARC-AGI-290%60%
GPQA Diamond94%93%
Humanity's Last Exam47%47%
SciCode63%60%
SimpleQA Verified71%51%
WebDev Arena17651674
WeirdML93%83%
SimpleBench61%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Kimi K3?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher (163) than Kimi K3 (158). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is cheaper on input tokens at $2.55 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5.1 or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5.1 or Kimi K3?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5.1 ranks higher — 100th vs 97th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.