← Back to Model Beat
Models·5d ago·all news from October 20, 2026

HarnessPro: Recursive Harness Self-Improvement with Pareto Optimization for Performance-Cost Trade-offs

arXiv:2610.26770v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Harness development plays a crucial role in building capable AI agents. Recent approaches improve harnesses through recursive self-improvement (RSI), but their performance gains often come with higher execution costs. We introduce HarnessPro, a label-free method for evolving harnesses to improve task performance while reducing execution cost. In this setting, candidate harnesses are evaluated using LLM-generated tests without access to ground-truth solutions or official tests. Specialized agents diagnose execution trajectories, plan updates with different performance-cost priorities, and implement them as candidate harnesses. Rather than returning a single harness, HarnessPro uses normalized weighted squared-distance selection to provide cost-focused (lite), balanced (medium), and performance-focused (heavy) harnesses for different deployment budgets. Selected harnesses enter the next iteration, where execution feedback guides further updates. Our experiments cover Terminal-Bench 2, SWE-Bench Pro, and ProgramBench, using GPT-5.5 with Codex and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code. Across these benchmarks using GPT-5.5 with Codex, the…

ModelsPareto

Covered by 1 source

  • AarXiv CS.AI↗Zhuoshi Pan, ZhiYuan Feng, Yukuo Cen, Honglin Lin, Junru Lu, Zhongxia Chen, Shuo Yang, H. Vicky Zhao, Jie Tang5d ago

Related stories

ProductsSarvam Vision 2.1: Pushing the Pareto frontier of document intelligenceSep 24 · 11 sourcesModelsPreference-Aware Pareto Steering for Multi-Task Speech LLMsOct 21ModelsParetoChat: An LLM-Based Interface for Interactive Multi-Objective OptimizationOct 19ModelsMOAE: Multi-Objective Agent Evolution with Pareto-Preserving SearchSep 9