Muse Spark vs Qwen 3.7 Max
Muse Spark (Meta AI) and Qwen 3.7 Max (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- Qwen 3.7 Max leads on overall intelligence (ECI 154 vs 152).
- Muse Spark ranks higher for coding (63th vs 61th percentile).
| Attribute | Muse Spark | Qwen 3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Intelligence (ECI) | 152 | 154 |
| Coding | 63 | 61 |
| Math | 58 | 62 |
| Reasoning & Knowledge | 74 | 72 |
| Agentic & Tools | 57 | 77 |
| Specifications | ||
| Developer | Meta AI | Alibaba |
| Family | — | Qwen |
| Released | Apr 8, 2026 | May 19, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Availability | API access | — |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Price — $/M input | — | $1.48 |
| Price — $/M output | — | $4.42 |
| Inputs | — | text |
| Outputs | — | text |
| Benchmarks | ||
| AIME 2024/2025 | 89% | 96% |
| FrontierMath | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 15% | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 90% | 91% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 41% | 41% |
| SciCode | 52% | 50% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66% | 56% |
| WebDev Arena | 1513 | 1517 |
| τ²-bench | 92% | 95% |
| SimpleBench | — | 70% |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77% |
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark better than Qwen 3.7 Max?
On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Qwen 3.7 Max scores higher (154) than Muse Spark (152). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.
Which is better for coding, Muse Spark or Qwen 3.7 Max?
Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Muse Spark ranks higher — 63th vs 61th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.