← All models
Compare

Muse Spark vs Qwen 3.7 Max

Muse Spark (Meta AI) and Qwen 3.7 Max (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

Muse SparkMeta AIQwen 3.7 MaxAlibaba · 4 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)155153
Coding8481
Math6978
Reasoning & Knowledge8685
Agentic & Tools6278
Specifications
DeveloperMeta AIAlibaba
FamilyQwen
ReleasedApr 8, 2026May 19, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window1M
Price — $/M input$1.25
Price — $/M output$3.75
Inputstext
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202589%95%
FrontierMath39%
FrontierMath Tier 415%
GPQA Diamond90%92%
Humanity's Last Exam41%38%
SciCode52%49%
SimpleQA Verified66%59%
WebDev Arena15131541
τ²-bench92%95%
SimpleBench70%
SWE-bench Verified77%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than Qwen 3.7 Max?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Muse Spark scores higher (155) than Qwen 3.7 Max (153). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Muse Spark or Qwen 3.7 Max?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Muse Spark ranks higher — 84th vs 81th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.