← All models
Compare

Grok 4.6 vs Trinity Large Thinking

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and Trinity Large Thinking (Arcee AI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGrok 4.6xAI · 2 in the newsTrinity Large ThinkingArcee AI
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156
Coding9218
Math92
Reasoning & Knowledge7319
Agentic & Tools8558
Specifications
DeveloperxAIArcee AI
FamilyGrok
ReleasedAug 12, 2026Apr 1, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window500K262K
Price — $/M input$2.00$0.25
Price — $/M output$6.00$0.80
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%
APEX41%
ARC-AGI88%
ARC-AGI-267%
GPQA Diamond94%75%
Humanity's Last Exam43%16%
SciCode56%41%
SimpleBench76%
SimpleQA Verified49%
WebDev Arena16291238
WeirdML67%
τ²-bench90%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper on input tokens at $0.25 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.6 or Trinity Large Thinking?

Grok 4.6 supports up to 500K tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.6 or Trinity Large Thinking?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 92th vs 18th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.