← All models
Compare

Grok 4.6 vs Step 3.7 Flash

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and Step 3.7 Flash (StepFun) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGrok 4.6xAI · 1 in the newsStep 3.7 FlashStepFun
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156
Coding9128
Math93
Reasoning & Knowledge7630
Agentic & Tools8998
Specifications
DeveloperxAIStepFun
FamilyGrok
ReleasedAug 12, 2026May 29, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window500K262K
Price — $/M input$2.00$0.20
Price — $/M output$6.00$1.15
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%
APEX41%
ARC-AGI88%
ARC-AGI-267%
GPQA Diamond94%81%
Humanity's Last Exam43%21%
SciCode54%40%
SimpleQA Verified54%
WebDev Arena1631
WeirdML67%
τ²-bench99%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.20 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.6 or Step 3.7 Flash?

Grok 4.6 supports up to 500K tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.6 or Step 3.7 Flash?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 91th vs 28th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.