← All models
Compare

Grok 4.6 vs Step 3.7 Flash

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and Step 3.7 Flash (StepFun) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGrok 4.6xAI · 3 in the newsStep 3.7 FlashStepFun
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156—
Coding8642
Math87—
Reasoning & Knowledge6924
Agentic & Tools9197
Specifications
DeveloperxAIStepFun
FamilyGrok—
ReleasedAug 12, 2026May 29, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window500K262K
Price — $/M input$2.00$0.20
Price — $/M output$6.00$1.15
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%—
APEX65%—
ARC-AGI88%—
ARC-AGI-267%—
GPQA Diamond94%81%
Humanity's Last Exam43%21%
SciCode56%44%
SimpleBench76%—
SimpleQA Verified49%—
WebDev Arena1618—
WeirdML67%—
τ²-bench—99%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.20 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.6 or Step 3.7 Flash?

Grok 4.6 supports up to 500K tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.6 or Step 3.7 Flash?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 86th vs 42th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.