← All models
Compare

Grok 4.6 vs Ring-2.6-1T

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and Ring-2.6-1T (Ant Group) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGrok 4.6xAI · 3 in the newsRing-2.6-1TAnt Group
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156—
Coding8646
Math87—
Reasoning & Knowledge6933
Agentic & Tools9162
Specifications
DeveloperxAIAnt Group
FamilyGrok—
ReleasedAug 12, 2026May 14, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window500K262K
Price — $/M input$2.00$0.07
Price — $/M output$6.00$0.63
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%—
APEX65%—
ARC-AGI88%—
ARC-AGI-267%—
GPQA Diamond94%86%
Humanity's Last Exam43%22%
SciCode56%45%
SimpleBench76%—
SimpleQA Verified49%—
WebDev Arena1618—
WeirdML67%—
τ²-bench—92%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Ring-2.6-1T?

Ring-2.6-1T is cheaper on input tokens at $0.07 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.6 or Ring-2.6-1T?

Grok 4.6 supports up to 500K tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.6 or Ring-2.6-1T?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 86th vs 46th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.