← All models
Compare

Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 27B

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and Qwen3.8 27B (Qwen) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGrok 4.6xAI · 3 in the newsQwen3.8 27BQwen · 20 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156—
Coding8649
Math87—
Reasoning & Knowledge6963
Agentic & Tools91—
Specifications
DeveloperxAIQwen
FamilyGrokQwen
ReleasedAug 12, 2026Aug 14, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityAPI access—
Context window500K1M
Price — $/M input$2.00$0.42
Price — $/M output$6.00$3.00
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%—
APEX65%—
ARC-AGI88%—
ARC-AGI-267%—
GPQA Diamond94%91%
Humanity's Last Exam43%34%
SciCode56%47%
SimpleBench76%—
SimpleQA Verified49%—
WebDev Arena1618—
WeirdML67%—

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper on input tokens at $0.42 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 500K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8 27B?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 86th vs 49th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.