← All models
Compare

Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (Qwen) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGrok 4.6xAI · 1 in the newsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156
Coding9177
Math93
Reasoning & Knowledge7690
Agentic & Tools89
Specifications
DeveloperxAIQwen
FamilyGrokQwen
ReleasedAug 12, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window500K1M
Price — $/M input$2.00$2.00
Price — $/M output$6.00$6.00
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%
APEX41%
ARC-AGI88%
ARC-AGI-267%
GPQA Diamond94%94%
Humanity's Last Exam43%42%
SciCode54%52%
SimpleQA Verified54%
WebDev Arena1631
WeirdML67%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Grok 4.6 is cheaper on input tokens at $2.00 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 500K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 91th vs 77th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.