← All models
Compare

Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGrok 4.6xAI · 3 in the newsQwen3.8-2.4T-A95BAlibaba · 2 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156—
Coding8678
Math87—
Reasoning & Knowledge6985
Agentic & Tools91—
Specifications
DeveloperxAIAlibaba
FamilyGrokQwen
ReleasedAug 12, 2026Aug 8, 2026
Parameters—2.4T
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (restricted use)
Context window500K1M
Price — $/M input$2.00$2.00
Price — $/M output$6.00$6.00
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%—
APEX65%—
ARC-AGI88%—
ARC-AGI-267%—
GPQA Diamond94%94%
Humanity's Last Exam43%42%
SciCode56%54%
SimpleBench76%—
SimpleQA Verified49%—
WebDev Arena1618—
WeirdML67%—

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B?

Grok 4.6 is cheaper on input tokens at $2.00 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B?

Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 500K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 86th vs 78th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.