← All models
Compare

Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and Qwen3.7 Flash (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGrok 4.6xAI · 2 in the newsQwen3.7 FlashAlibaba
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156145
Coding92
Math9234
Reasoning & Knowledge7327
Agentic & Tools85
Specifications
DeveloperxAIAlibaba
FamilyGrokQwen
ReleasedAug 12, 2026Jul 27, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window500K1M
Price — $/M input$2.00$0.03
Price — $/M output$6.00$0.13
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%87%
APEX41%
ARC-AGI88%
ARC-AGI-267%
GPQA Diamond94%82%
Humanity's Last Exam43%
SciCode56%
SimpleBench76%
SimpleQA Verified49%
WebDev Arena1629
WeirdML67%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Grok 4.6 scores higher (156) than Qwen3.7 Flash (145). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.03 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 500K for the other.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.