← All models
Compare

Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 397B-A17B

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGrok 4.6xAI · 2 in the newsQwen3.5 397B-A17BAlibaba · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156147
Coding9233
Math9142
Reasoning & Knowledge7340
Agentic & Tools8435
Specifications
DeveloperxAIAlibaba
FamilyGrokQwen
ReleasedAug 12, 2026Feb 15, 2026
Parameters397B
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window500K262K
Price — $/M input$2.00$0.39
Price — $/M output$6.00$2.34
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%89%
APEX41%
ARC-AGI88%
ARC-AGI-267%
GPQA Diamond94%86%
Humanity's Last Exam43%20%
SciCode56%42%
SimpleBench76%
SimpleQA Verified49%
WebDev Arena1629
WeirdML67%
τ²-bench84%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Grok 4.6 scores higher (156) than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B (147). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is cheaper on input tokens at $0.39 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Grok 4.6 supports up to 500K tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 92th vs 33th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.