← All models
Compare

Grok 4.6 vs Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B)

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B) (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGrok 4.6xAI · 2 in the newsQwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B)Alibaba
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156147
Coding9239
Math9125
Reasoning & Knowledge7325
Agentic & Tools8424
Specifications
DeveloperxAIAlibaba
FamilyGrokQwen
ReleasedAug 12, 2026Feb 16, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window500K
Price — $/M input$2.00
Price — $/M output$6.00
Inputstext, image, file
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%87%
APEX41%14%
ARC-AGI88%
ARC-AGI-267%
GPQA Diamond94%85%
Humanity's Last Exam43%
SciCode56%
SimpleBench76%
SimpleQA Verified49%25%
WebDev Arena16291399
WeirdML67%
FrontierMath21%
FrontierMath Tier 42%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B)?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Grok 4.6 scores higher (156) than Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B) (147). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.6 or Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B)?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 92th vs 39th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.