← All models
Compare

Grok 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor (Meta) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGrok 4.6xAI · 3 in the newsMuse Spark 1.2 ContributorMeta
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156—
Coding86—
Math87—
Reasoning & Knowledge69—
Agentic & Tools91—
Specifications
DeveloperxAIMeta
FamilyGrok—
ReleasedAug 12, 2026Aug 21, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityAPI access—
Context window500K1M
Price — $/M input$2.00$0.10
Price — $/M output$6.00$0.20
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video, file
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%—
APEX65%—
ARC-AGI88%—
ARC-AGI-267%—
GPQA Diamond94%—
Humanity's Last Exam43%—
SciCode56%—
SimpleBench76%—
SimpleQA Verified49%—
WebDev Arena1618—
WeirdML67%—

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor?

Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor is cheaper on input tokens at $0.10 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.6 or Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor?

Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 500K for the other.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.